View Javadoc
1   ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
2   // checkstyle: Checks Java source code and other text files for adherence to a set of rules.
3   // Copyright (C) 2001-2024 the original author or authors.
4   //
5   // This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
6   // modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public
7   // License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either
8   // version 2.1 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
9   //
10  // This library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
11  // but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
12  // MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU
13  // Lesser General Public License for more details.
14  //
15  // You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public
16  // License along with this library; if not, write to the Free Software
17  // Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA  02111-1307  USA
18  ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
19  
20  package com.puppycrawl.tools.checkstyle.checks.javadoc;
21  
22  import java.util.Optional;
23  
24  import com.puppycrawl.tools.checkstyle.StatelessCheck;
25  import com.puppycrawl.tools.checkstyle.api.AbstractCheck;
26  import com.puppycrawl.tools.checkstyle.api.DetailAST;
27  import com.puppycrawl.tools.checkstyle.api.TokenTypes;
28  import com.puppycrawl.tools.checkstyle.utils.CheckUtil;
29  import com.puppycrawl.tools.checkstyle.utils.JavadocUtil;
30  
31  /**
32   * <p>
33   * Checks for missing package definition Javadoc comments in package-info.java files.
34   * </p>
35   * <p>
36   * Rationale: description and other related documentation for a package can be written up
37   * in the package-info.java file and it gets used in the production of the Javadocs.
38   * See <a
39   * href="https://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/technotes/tools/windows/javadoc.html#packagecomment"
40   * >link</a> for more info.
41   * </p>
42   * <p>
43   * This check specifically only validates package definitions. It will not validate any methods or
44   * interfaces declared in the package-info.java file.
45   * </p>
46   * <p>
47   * Parent is {@code com.puppycrawl.tools.checkstyle.TreeWalker}
48   * </p>
49   * <p>
50   * Violation Message Keys:
51   * </p>
52   * <ul>
53   * <li>
54   * {@code package.javadoc.missing}
55   * </li>
56   * </ul>
57   *
58   * @since 8.22
59   */
60  @StatelessCheck
61  public class MissingJavadocPackageCheck extends AbstractCheck {
62  
63      /**
64       * A key is pointing to the warning message text in "messages.properties"
65       * file.
66       */
67      public static final String MSG_PKG_JAVADOC_MISSING = "package.javadoc.missing";
68  
69      @Override
70      public int[] getDefaultTokens() {
71          return getRequiredTokens();
72      }
73  
74      @Override
75      public int[] getAcceptableTokens() {
76          return getRequiredTokens();
77      }
78  
79      @Override
80      public int[] getRequiredTokens() {
81          return new int[] {TokenTypes.PACKAGE_DEF};
82      }
83  
84      @Override
85      public boolean isCommentNodesRequired() {
86          return true;
87      }
88  
89      @Override
90      public void visitToken(DetailAST ast) {
91          if (CheckUtil.isPackageInfo(getFilePath()) && !hasJavadoc(ast)) {
92              log(ast, MSG_PKG_JAVADOC_MISSING);
93          }
94      }
95  
96      /**
97       * Checks that there is javadoc before ast.
98       * Because of <a href="https://github.com/checkstyle/checkstyle/issues/4392">parser bug</a>
99       * parser can place javadoc comment either as previous sibling of package definition
100      * or (if there is annotation between package def and javadoc) inside package definition tree.
101      * So we should look for javadoc in both places.
102      *
103      * @param ast {@link TokenTypes#PACKAGE_DEF} token to check
104      * @return true if there is javadoc, false otherwise
105      */
106     private static boolean hasJavadoc(DetailAST ast) {
107         final boolean hasJavadocBefore = ast.getPreviousSibling() != null
108             && isJavadoc(ast.getPreviousSibling());
109         return hasJavadocBefore || hasJavadocAboveAnnotation(ast);
110     }
111 
112     /**
113      * Checks javadoc existence in annotations list.
114      *
115      * @param ast package def
116      * @return true if there is a javadoc, false otherwise
117      */
118     private static boolean hasJavadocAboveAnnotation(DetailAST ast) {
119         final Optional<DetailAST> firstAnnotationChild = Optional.of(ast.getFirstChild())
120             .map(DetailAST::getFirstChild)
121             .map(DetailAST::getFirstChild);
122         boolean result = false;
123         if (firstAnnotationChild.isPresent()) {
124             for (DetailAST child = firstAnnotationChild.orElseThrow(); child != null;
125                  child = child.getNextSibling()) {
126                 if (isJavadoc(child)) {
127                     result = true;
128                     break;
129                 }
130             }
131         }
132         return result;
133     }
134 
135     /**
136      * Checks that ast is a javadoc comment.
137      *
138      * @param ast token to check
139      * @return true if ast is a javadoc comment, false otherwise
140      */
141     private static boolean isJavadoc(DetailAST ast) {
142         return ast.getType() == TokenTypes.BLOCK_COMMENT_BEGIN && JavadocUtil.isJavadocComment(ast);
143     }
144 }